<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Pushing&#8221; Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cristianobetta.com/2007/03/04/pushing-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cristianobetta.com/2007/03/04/pushing-trends/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cristiano Gerard Betta</title>
		<link>http://blog.cristianobetta.com/2007/03/04/pushing-trends/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristiano Gerard Betta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cristianobetta.com/2007/03/04/pushing-trends/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Ok, good point. So the real question is: now that we managed to get the internet infrastructure to this point that it can handle this demand, aren't the current protocols (http, etc) a bit outdated? I mean, people are now using AJAX with Jason and Comet to create a virtual pushing protocol. Wouldn't it be nice of internet pages could actually have real push protocols?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, good point. So the real question is: now that we managed to get the internet infrastructure to this point that it can handle this demand, aren&#8217;t the current protocols (http, etc) a bit outdated? I mean, people are now using AJAX with Jason and Comet to create a virtual pushing protocol. Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice of internet pages could actually have real push protocols?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan W</title>
		<link>http://blog.cristianobetta.com/2007/03/04/pushing-trends/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cristianobetta.com/2007/03/04/pushing-trends/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it is due to the increased access to broadband. More bandwidth available means it doesnt matter if you've got a client checking to see if there are any messages waiting for it every few minutes. If I had twiterific open and checking for tweets every minute on a 33kbits dialup connection it would use a big chunk of my bandwidth but on my nive 10Mbits broadband connection it barely makes a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it is due to the increased access to broadband. More bandwidth available means it doesnt matter if you&#8217;ve got a client checking to see if there are any messages waiting for it every few minutes. If I had twiterific open and checking for tweets every minute on a 33kbits dialup connection it would use a big chunk of my bandwidth but on my nive 10Mbits broadband connection it barely makes a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
